> "...Alexander Solzhenitsyn did something strange. The famed novelist and political dissident dropped into the mail a sixty-page letter, addressed to the Soviet leadership... It’s hard to overemphasize what a weird thing this was to do... But while no one really believed in the government, you certainly weren’t allowed to criticize it."
Letter writing was actually a big part of Soviet political culture. If you ever have to comb through Soviet primary sources, letters to the government or responses from the government make up a significant portion of primary source documents telling us about daily life in the Soviet Union.
Obviously, you had to be careful of what you said in a letter, but in a nation where demonstrations and protests were tightly cracked down upon, private letters to the government were a way for citizen to vent their frustrations or speak to people in their government. The Soviets cared a lot about what people said publicly, they cared a lot less about what people said privately to the government.
While you couldn't exactly send a letter like Solzhenitsyn's, you could send a strongly worded letter critical of the government. The KGB actually relied heavily on letters to gauge public sentiments because letters provided information directly from the population, rather than having that information filtered through numerous layers of bureaucracy.
Overall, enjoyable piece, but letter writing was not out of the ordinary in the Soviet Union.
> While the end of Soviet rule undoubtedly had its advantages (especially for the captive peoples of what was then called “Eastern Europe”), the transition was brutal. Between 1991 and 1996, GDP in Russia fell by 37%. The situation in some of the other former Soviet republics was even more bleak. GDP in Ukraine fell by 53% between 1991 and 1996, and even as of 2015 GDP remained at 63% of its 1991 level.
Then again USSR GDP statistics aren't the most credible.
Great review. Thank you. It strikes me that Solz was also aware of the prime Biblical case in which democracy (after a fashion) was tried and found wanting, in 1st Samuel 8. The people cry out en masse for a king like the nations. Via the prophet Samuel, God warns against it. He tells them how the project will go wrong--high taxes; a military draft; increasing tyranny by the "chosen" leader; more and more citizens roped into government "service". They "vote" for it anyway. The predictions come true.
Nice read, weirdly shoehorned point about the US at the end. Like the type of paragraph I'd write at the end of a report in high school to show how my points have broad relevance and thus make my text seem more profound.
> "...Alexander Solzhenitsyn did something strange. The famed novelist and political dissident dropped into the mail a sixty-page letter, addressed to the Soviet leadership... It’s hard to overemphasize what a weird thing this was to do... But while no one really believed in the government, you certainly weren’t allowed to criticize it."
Letter writing was actually a big part of Soviet political culture. If you ever have to comb through Soviet primary sources, letters to the government or responses from the government make up a significant portion of primary source documents telling us about daily life in the Soviet Union.
Obviously, you had to be careful of what you said in a letter, but in a nation where demonstrations and protests were tightly cracked down upon, private letters to the government were a way for citizen to vent their frustrations or speak to people in their government. The Soviets cared a lot about what people said publicly, they cared a lot less about what people said privately to the government.
While you couldn't exactly send a letter like Solzhenitsyn's, you could send a strongly worded letter critical of the government. The KGB actually relied heavily on letters to gauge public sentiments because letters provided information directly from the population, rather than having that information filtered through numerous layers of bureaucracy.
Overall, enjoyable piece, but letter writing was not out of the ordinary in the Soviet Union.
> While the end of Soviet rule undoubtedly had its advantages (especially for the captive peoples of what was then called “Eastern Europe”), the transition was brutal. Between 1991 and 1996, GDP in Russia fell by 37%. The situation in some of the other former Soviet republics was even more bleak. GDP in Ukraine fell by 53% between 1991 and 1996, and even as of 2015 GDP remained at 63% of its 1991 level.
Then again USSR GDP statistics aren't the most credible.
Great review. Thank you. It strikes me that Solz was also aware of the prime Biblical case in which democracy (after a fashion) was tried and found wanting, in 1st Samuel 8. The people cry out en masse for a king like the nations. Via the prophet Samuel, God warns against it. He tells them how the project will go wrong--high taxes; a military draft; increasing tyranny by the "chosen" leader; more and more citizens roped into government "service". They "vote" for it anyway. The predictions come true.
Nice read, weirdly shoehorned point about the US at the end. Like the type of paragraph I'd write at the end of a report in high school to show how my points have broad relevance and thus make my text seem more profound.
Thanks. You made what could be a boring subject interesting. More importantly, I've learned new things.