7 Comments

Thanks for yet another great post! This blog is so consistently fantastic, it is one of my favorite things on the entire internet. I must thank both of you profusely for it.

Expand full comment

I'll defend the "children in the city" position, but it needs to be the right city. I live in London (England), and before I had kids I assumed that I, too, would want to move out once I was a parent, but the opposite has been true. I think there has been a relatively recent revolution in child friendliness; public transit is free for kids, nappy changing stations and high chairs are now pretty much universal, museums are basically all well equipped for kids (and free), I live on a big beautiful park with multiple more within walking distance, I get my groceries delivered, school and nursery are sub ten minutes away, the local church hosts (multicultural, five minutes walk) play groups... And there are plenty of other parents around!

Is my house small? Yes, it is, and I admit it would be a squeeze with more than two kids (albeit could renovate the loft to fit a third). But we pack our lunches and are outside almost all of every day, and I don't even own a car; parenthood in the city has been lovely. Looking ahead, London's schools are now excellent and crime is much lower than it used to be.

Expand full comment

>>Sure, that photo looks great (if you’re allergic to color and texture) and the HGTV hosts love ‘em, but imagine actually living in that room with children. Seriously, just try: how fast are the cushions coming off those couches? How fast are your neutrals drowned beneath colorful toys and backpacks?

Imagine that room as an ape-adapted gym! Throw out the sofas, put in climbing frames, mattresses and a few pilates balls. Then you can raise ten kids there. But yes, it would be great to have rooms for individuals on the sides. Being rich is the best option.

Expand full comment