Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dave Tamanini's avatar

Thanks for the review. My sole comment is; I think, because over the last 60 years of trying to keep fit (and maintain weight within a 20 lb range(up and down), that exercise builds muscle that weighs more than the lost fat. Perhaps the studies of limited (or zero) weight loss over controlled time periods may have not taken into account the amount of fat that was lost and replaced by muscle.

Expand full comment
Performative Bafflement's avatar

I realize I'm a year late to this party, but isn't the big thing being missed (at least I didn't see it addressed at all) is that Hadza hunter gatherers are *much* smaller, men and women, in both stature and weight?

"How can we both be burning roughly 2000 calories a day?"

You're comparing extremely active 5' 3" 115 pound men and 4' 11" 95 pound women to 5' 10" 190 pounds western men and 5' 6" 170 pound western women. Raw number of calories burned daily isn't the relevant metric when comparing vastly different size / weight adults, why isn't this regularized by some height * weight metric, or at least fat free mass?

I realize the chart is trended by body weight, with imputed lines, but that isn't really doing that regularization in a way that makes sense either, considering Hadza men are probably 10% body fat and western men are 40% body fat, and Hadza men are well below any western men in the chart.

I've never got this generally when people talk about hunter gatherers. I've read Lieberman's Exercised (great book, highly recommend it), and he talks a lot about them too, but everyone seems to just not pay attention to the fact that they're tiny and have lower caloric needs total, and this in large part explains their calorie budgets.

Expand full comment
9 more comments...

No posts